U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 2009 · Agee, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
359 F. App'x 396

United States v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Mitchell, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 7:97-cr-00057-BR-1, 2009 WL 3348284 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 14, 2009 & entered Oct. 15, 2009). We dispense *397with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.