Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 2009 · Agee, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
359 F. App'x 396

Counsel

Clinton Mitchell, III, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Mitchell, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 7:97-cr-00057-BR-1, 2009 WL 3348284 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 14, 2009 & entered Oct. 15, 2009). We dispense *397with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.