U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Washington

United States v. Washington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 2009 · Michael, Shedd, Traxler
328 F. App'x 163

United States v. Washington

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mario Faneak Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Washington, No. 1:04-cr-00063-LHT-l (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.