Pringle. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
Pringle. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2229
WILLIAM C. PRINGLE, SR.; LISA PRINGLE,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK NA; BOB CAPES REALTORS; FANNIE MAE; FREDDIE MAC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-04146-JFA)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William C. Pringle, Sr., Lisa Pringle, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Catharine Garbee Griffin, BAKER, RAVENEL & BENDER, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Preston Wood, ROGERS, TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William C. Pringle, Sr., and Lisa Pringle appeal the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss,
denying Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment, and
dismissing as moot Plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction and
Defendant Bob Cape Realtors’ motion to sever. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Pringle v. EMC
Mortgage Corp., No. 3:08-cv-04146-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished