U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Pringle. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation

Pringle. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2010

Pringle. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2229

WILLIAM C. PRINGLE, SR.; LISA PRINGLE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK NA; BOB CAPES REALTORS; FANNIE MAE; FREDDIE MAC, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-04146-JFA)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. Pringle, Sr., Lisa Pringle, Appellants Pro Se.

Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Catharine Garbee Griffin, BAKER, RAVENEL & BENDER, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Preston Wood, ROGERS, TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William C. Pringle, Sr., and Lisa Pringle appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss, denying Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment, and dismissing as moot Plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction and Defendant Bob Cape Realtors’ motion to sever. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pringle v. EMC Mortgage Corp., No. 3:08-cv-04146-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.