United States v. Maxwell
United States v. Maxwell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8034
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00262-1)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the production of exculpatory evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Maxwell, No. 1:93-cr-00262-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 8, 2009; entered Oct. 9, 2009). We further deny Maxwell’s motion to suppress exculpatory evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.