United States v. Clarke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Clarke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7993

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NIGEL CLARKE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00060-H-5)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nigel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nigel Clarke appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for discovery and to proceed in forma

pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Clarke, No. 4:02-cr-00060-H-5

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished