U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Smith v. Burnell

Smith v. Burnell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 28, 2010

Smith v. Burnell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7821

RICKEY SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. T. BURNELL, Sergeant; JOHN DOE, Lieutenant; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-01089-TLW)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rickey Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Janet Carol Brooks, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rickey Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Burnell, No. 4:08-cv-01089-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.