United States v. Martin
United States v. Martin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7169
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LORENZO GRODE MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00226-TSE)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Grode Martin, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Grode Martin appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martin, No. 1:00-cr-00226-TSE (E.D. Va. June 2, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.