United States v. Blagrove
United States v. Blagrove
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7716
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony A. Blagrove appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Blagrove, No. 2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2009). We
further deny Blagrove’s motion for documents in his brother’s
district court case. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished