Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1852

MATTHEW ENDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INCORPORATED; THE PARKSITE GROUP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03211-JFM; 1:08-cv-03042-JFM)

Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Enders, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., McLean, Virginia; James R. Pranger, NEAL, GERBER AND EISENBERG, LLC, Chicago, Illinois; Steven D. Silverman, Andrew Clayton White, SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Matthew Enders appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for Appellees. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Enders v. Ryder

Integrated Logistics, Inc., Nos. 1:08-cv-03211-JFM;

1:08-cv-03042-JFM (D. Md. July 16, 2009). We deny as moot

Enders’ motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished