United States v. Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6227

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

IKE RAYEFORD WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 1:02-cv-00359)

Submitted: January 25, 2010 Decided: February 3, 2010

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George B. Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina; M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., RUDOLF, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ike Rayeford Williams appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying his “Motion to Re-enter Previous Order of 24 June 2005.”

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3;

1:02-cv-00359 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished