Jack v. Dawson
Jack v. Dawson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1628
TODD M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRESIDENT CUTLER DAWSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00032-gec)
Submitted: January 20, 2010 Decided: February 3, 2010
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Jack v. Dawson, No. 5:09-cv-00032-gec (W.D. Va.
May 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished