Snowden v. Heaslewood

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Snowden v. Heaslewood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1367

EARLENE M. SNOWDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLAUDINE HEASLEWOOD; SHAPIRO & BURSON, LLP; SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-00674-DKC)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 2, 2010

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earlene M. Snowden, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Barry Fisher, Scott R. Robinson, FISHER LAW GROUP, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Earlene M. Snowden appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Snowden’s

motion for summary judgment, application for writ of audita

querela, emergency application for ex parte temporary

injunction, and motion for subpoena. Snowden has also filed in

this court a motion for summary judgment, seeking judgment

against Defendant on the basis of fraud and theft. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated by

the district court. Snowden v. Heaslewood, No. 8:08-cv-00674-

DKC (D. Md. March 23, 2009). We also deny Snowden’s motion for

summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished