Richardson v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7916

CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Individual and official capacity; HIPP, Lieutenant, Individual and official capacity; EVANS CONTROL TRANSPORTATION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL, Individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:08-cv-02596-RBH)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Heath McAlvin Stewart, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to reconsider the order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. South

Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:08-cv-02596-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 1,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished