U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Bryan v. SCDC

Bryan v. SCDC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2010

Bryan v. SCDC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7953

EDWARD SABARI BRYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCDC; JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00846-RBH)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Sabari Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Edward Sabari Bryan appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for the Defendants on Bryan’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. SCDC, No. 3:08-cv-00846-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2009). Additionally, we deny Bryan’s motions to compel and for production of a transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.