United States v. Vassell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Vassell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES VASSELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:89-cr-00190-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Vassell, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Vassell appeals the district court’s orders

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motions for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Vassell, No.

3:89-cr-00190-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. May 20 & June 18, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished