U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Worrell

United States v. Worrell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 2010

United States v. Worrell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DAVID ISSAC WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Issac Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct.

21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.