United States v. Rita
United States v. Rita
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7571
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VICTOR A. RITA, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00105-MR-DCK-1; 3:08-cv-00260-MR)
Submitted: January 29, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor A. Rita, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Victor A. Rita, Jr. seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West
Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a
circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability
will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A
prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that
reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the
constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or
wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38(2003); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000);
Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d 676, 683-84(4th Cir. 2001). We have
independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rita has not
made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished