Mullins v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mullins v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1193

JIMMY MULLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02690-CCB)

Submitted: January 27, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Stolarz, THE STOLARZ LAW FIRM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gwen B. Tromley, Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Mullins appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for leave to amend his complaint and granting

the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on Mullins’ claim of

age discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Mullins v. Mayor, No. 1:07-cv-02690-CCB

(D. Md. Jan. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished