U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Wright

United States v. Wright
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 5, 2010 · Duncan, Agee, Hamilton
368 F. App'x 416

United States v. Wright

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marty Lorenzo Wright appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Clarification” in which he sought to contest the court’s earlier order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *417 United States v. Wright, No. 4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.