Mullins v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City
Mullins v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1195
DEBORAH A. MULLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; CHARLES KRYSIAK, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02454-CCB)
Submitted: February 11, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John B. Stolarz, THE STOLARZ LAW FIRM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gary Gilkey, Chief Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Deborah Mullins appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for leave to amend the complaint and granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment on Mullins’ claims of gender discrimination, First Amendment retaliation, and tortious interference with contract and economic relations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Mullins v. Mayor and City of Baltimore, No. 1:07-cv-02454-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.