U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Sturkey v. Ozmint

Sturkey v. Ozmint
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2010

Sturkey v. Ozmint

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6535

WILLIE JOE STURKEY, a/k/a Willie Sturkey, a/k/a Willie J.

Sturkey, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JON OZMINT, Director SCDC; MICHAEL MATTHEW, SCDC Division of Records; MS. WATTA, Paymaster; WARDEN BAZZLE, Perry Correctional Institution, in their individual capacity; MRS. F OGUNSILE, a/k/a Felicia Ogunsile, Case Manager, Perry Correctional Institution; MRS. NFN ROOF, Financial Accountant, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01502-MBS)

Submitted: February 9, 2010 Decided: March 1, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Joe Sturkey, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Willie Joe Sturkey appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sturkey v. Ozmint, No. 8:07-cv-01502-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.