Bautista v. Clemson University
Bautista v. Clemson University
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1396
GLORIA BAUTISTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CLEMSON UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01287-HFF)
Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 1, 2010
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin Hutson, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant.
James W. Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gloria Bautista appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s reports and recommendations to grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her race and national origin discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Bautista v. Clemson Univ., No. 8:07-cv-01287-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.