U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Cascio v. State of Maryland

Cascio v. State of Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2010

Cascio v. State of Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7843

HARRY JAMES CASCIO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; GOVERNMENT OF BALTIMORE COUNTY; NORRIS BYRNES, Retired Judge; KAREN JONES, Ms., Esq.; JOE ASENSIO, Mr., Esq., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-01938-RWT)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry James Cascio, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Harry James Cascio appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cascio v. State of Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-01938-RWT (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.