U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Magdaleno

United States v. Magdaleno
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 5, 2010

United States v. Magdaleno

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8191

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. IVAN MAGDALENO, Defendant – Appellant.

No. 10-6254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IVAN MAGDALENO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivan Magdaleno, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ivan Magdaleno appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), his motion for reconsideration of that denial, and his motion to reopen the case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Magdaleno, No. 7:06-cr- 00703-GRA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2009; Nov. 25, 2009; Jan. 26, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.