U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia

Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2010

Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6046

DAVID L. REYNOLDS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David L. Reynolds appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). Additionally, we deny as unnecessary Reynolds’ motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.