U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Addison

United States v. Addison
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2010 · Motz, Duncan, Hamilton
376 F. App'x 287

Counsel

Sean Robert Addison, Appellant pro se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Addison

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Robert Addison appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Addison, No. 0:99-cr-00659-CMC-4 (D.S.C. Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.