D'Alessandro v. Montgomery County, Maryland
D'Alessandro v. Montgomery County, Maryland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6296
MICHAEL RICHARD D’ALESSANDRO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; SUZYK MALAGARY; JOHN DOE, Case Manager; GRANT CLARK, Property Manager, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:09-cv-00190-PJM)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 28, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Richard D’Alessandro, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Lisehora Kane, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Richard D’Alessandro appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. D’Alessandro v. Montgomery County, No. 8:09-cv- 00190-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 20, 2009; entered Jan. 21, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.