Shafer v. Ellis
Shafer v. Ellis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7689
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON, Ethics Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-00482-PJM)
Submitted: May 21, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shafer v. Ellis, No. 8:08-cv-00482-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.