U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Ruther v. Contreras

Ruther v. Contreras
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 4, 2010

Ruther v. Contreras

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2188

L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CECELIA CONTRERAS; MARK SIMMONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00495-RLW)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Contreras, No. 3:09-cv-00495-RLW (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.