U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Roberts

United States v. Roberts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 7, 2010 · Gregory, Shedd, Keenan
381 F. App'x 313

United States v. Roberts

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roberts, No. 4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (EJD.Va. Oct. 22, 2009 & filed Nov. 4, 2009, entered Nov. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.