Jackson v. United States
Jackson v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8226
EUGENE ERNST JACKSON, Petitioner – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Ernst Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Leotta, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Eugene Ernst Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for Writ of Audita Querela pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. United States, Nos. 1:09-cv-02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.