Hinton v. Trans Union LLC
Hinton v. Trans Union LLC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2045
KENNETH HINTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TRANS UNION LLC; EQUIFAX, INC., d/b/a Equifax Information Services LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00170-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Erik J. Grohmann, Paul L.
Myers, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Barry Goheen, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Kenneth Hinton appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Trans Union LLC’s motion for costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hinton v. Trans Union LLC, No. 1:09-cv-00170-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Sept.
2, 2009; entered Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.