Wallin v. Buzzell
Wallin v. Buzzell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1154
JOHN B. WALLIN; WANDA N. WALLIN, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. STEPHEN F. BUZZELL; KIMBERLY B. BUZZELL, Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00796-RLW)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen F. Buzzell, Kimberly B. Buzzell, Appellants Pro Se.
William Ashley Neale Burgess, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Stephen F. Buzzell and Kimberly B. Buzzell appeal the district court’s order dismissing their motion for reconsideration of its remand order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(c), (d) (2006).
Because the district court’s remand to state court of an unlawful detainer proceeding filed under Virginia law was premised on its lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the district court’s order is not subject to review. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28 (1995).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.