Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.
Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1237
RANDY WILLIAMS; MARY WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. APAC ATLANTIC, INC.; APAC, INC.; APAC CAROLINA INC., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-03432-JFA)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Williams, Mary Williams, Appellants Pro Se. Clayton Monroe Custer, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the Williams’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., No. 3:08-cv-03432-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.