United States v. Lee
United States v. Lee
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Paul A. Lee appeals the district court’s orders denying his: petition for reconsideration to unseal pre-indictment First Amendment issues; motion to file second supplement; motion to re-file[ ] defendant’s original sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006); motion for Rule 55(a) default judgment; motion for an order granting his § 3582(c)(2) motion; amended motion for Rule 55(a) default judgment; motion to re-file a second motion for reconsideration; and motion to re-file his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 8, 9 & 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.