U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Sindram v. Robelen

Sindram v. Robelen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2010

Sindram v. Robelen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1374

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, Defendant – Appellee, and PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s orders striking his “Verified Amended Complaint and Request for Injunctive Relief” from the docket and denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2010; filed May 21, 2010 & entered June 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.