U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Akinro v. Baltimore United States Post Office Policemen

Akinro v. Baltimore United States Post Office Policemen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2010

Akinro v. Baltimore United States Post Office Policemen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1580

FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE U.S. POST OFFICE POLICEMEN, et al., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01151-JFM)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Baltimore U.S. Post Office Policemen, No. 1:10-cv-01151-JFM (D. Md. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.