U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Cupp v. Brown

Cupp v. Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 4, 2010

Cupp v. Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8214

STEVEN CUPP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff; CECIL NICHOLS; JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden; DEBRA RANKIN; KUMA DEBOO; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.