Sturdivant v. McHugh
Sturdivant v. McHugh
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2376
NATHAN STURDIVANT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN MCHUGH, Honorable, Department of the Army; SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA)
Submitted: July 26, 2010 Decided: August 16, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nathan Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sturdivant v. McHugh, No. 1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA (E.D.
Va., filed Nov. 19, 2009 & entered Nov. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.