Akinro v. Ramada Limited
Akinro v. Ramada Limited
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1695
FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAMADA LIMITED; INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT; UCLA-HARBOR MEDICAL; SUPERIOR COURT OF INGLEWOOD, et al., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01394-WMN)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Ramada Ltd., No. 1:10-cv-01394-WMN (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.