U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Akinro v. Hecida Hotel

Akinro v. Hecida Hotel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 27, 2010

Akinro v. Hecida Hotel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1698

FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HECIDA HOTEL; INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT; UCLA-HARBOR MEDICAL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01452-RDB)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Hecida Hotel, No. 1:10-cv-01452-RDB (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.