UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6627

NATHANIEL HAROLD GREEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF BERKELEY; FAMILY COURT; PAUL LABARRON; SANDY HOLLAND; JACK A. LANDIS; WAYNE M.

CREECH; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (6:10-cv-00396-TLW)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Harold Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Harold Green appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Green v. South Carolina, No. 6:10- cv-00396-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED