U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television

Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 1, 2010

Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1623

SAMUEL G. BAILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC.; PARAMOUNT; VIACOM, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00787-JRS)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel G. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. John B. O’Keefe, LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Samuel G. Bailey appeals the district court’s order denying his copyright complaint against Black Entertainment Television, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Black Entm’t Television, Inc., No. 3:009-cv-00787-JRS (E.D. Va. May 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.