U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Jackson v. Poplin

Jackson v. Poplin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2010

Jackson v. Poplin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6441

SAMUEL R. JACKSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. H. POPLIN, Programmer, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; S. HOVERMALE, Kitchen Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; SGT. R. NICHOLSON; SGT. D. LENTZ, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00107-GCM)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Poplin, No. 3:10-cv-00107-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2010). We also deny Jackson’s pending motions to appoint counsel and to amend his complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.