Smith v. Winfrey
Smith v. Winfrey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1660
WILLIAM EARL SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OPRAH WINFREY, Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: August 18, 2010 Decided: September 9, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Earl Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Earl Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) for want of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Winfrey, No. 2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. May 18, 2010). The motion to seal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.