Gray v. EMC Mortgage
Gray v. EMC Mortgage
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1747
JEFFREY K. GRAY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. EMC MORTGAGE, Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02768-AW)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey K. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Nathan Heyer, THOMPSON & HINE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jeffrey K. Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gray’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gray has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Gray’s motion to appoint counsel an dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.