U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Dais

United States v. Dais
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2010

United States v. Dais

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NORMAN TYRONE DAIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Florence, at District of South Carolina. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of documents for his inspection. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Dais has not given any substantial reason for granting the request. We also deny his motion for an expedited appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.