U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Young

United States v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2010

United States v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6761

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:88-cr-00112-1)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 1:88-cr-00112-1 (S.D. W. Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.