United States v. Thomas
United States v. Thomas
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jermaine Pierre Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of that court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Thomas, No. 7:02-cr-00009-F-1 (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2010); see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.